Listen - Sponsor - Stations


Home Page
Return Home
Future & Past Guests
Affiliate Syndication
About Bryant McGill
Meet Your Co-Hosts
Friends of McGill Live
Event Photographs
Program Archives
OUR COMMUNITY
Request an Interview
Sponsor Information
Apply to be a Guest
Guestbook & Comments
Contact Us
Other Features
McGill's Online Works
Featured Treaty Signers
Vision Board
Int'l Photo Journal
Universality of Suffering
Books by Guests
Night Riders Magazine
Xammon Magazine
GUEST WEBSEARCH
Links, Media & info
Media Links
Top News Stories
World News Archives
External McGill Sites
Bryant's Official Site
The Goodwill Treaty
McGill Charities
Candle Vigils
Give Yourself
No Secrets, No Fear

Carmen Electra
Michael Jackson
Matt Damon
Montel Williams
Ray Romano
Evander Holyfield
Me & Cheech
Ray Lewis
Boomer


Light a Candle
Heal the World



Interesting World News


Discuss this Article | Post Another Article for Discussion

Patriot Act Setback:

Special Court Rejects Ashcroft Wiretap Rules
August 22, 2002
By TED BRIDIS, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) - A special court that oversees sensitive law enforcement surveillance forced Attorney General John Ashcroft to change his guidelines for FBI terrorism searches and wiretaps, according to documents released Thursday.
The U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which has not publicly disclosed any of its rulings in nearly two decades, rejected some of the Ashcroft guidelines in May as "not reasonably designed" to safeguard the privacy of Americans.

The Justice Department quickly amended its guidelines and won the court's approval. Nevertheless, Bush administration officials said Thursday they have appealed the restrictions, arguing that the new limits inhibit the sharing of information between terrorism investigators and criminal detectives.

Justice Department spokeswoman Barbara Comstock said the court has severely hampered the use of a broad anti-terrorism law that expanded the government's power to monitor people when terrorism is suspected.

"They have in our view incorrectly interpreted the Patriot Act, and the effect of that incorrect interpretation is to limit the kind of coordination that we think is very important," Comstock said.

The Justice Department declined to release a copy of the appeal Thursday night to reporters. Officials said it was coincidence that the appeal was filed the same day the court made its ruling public.

The court also disclosed the FBI acknowledged making more than 75 mistakes in applications for espionage and terrorism warrants under the surveillance law, including one instance in which former Director Louis Freeh gave inaccurate information to judges.

"How these misrepresentations occurred remains unexplained to the court," the special court said.

The court's May 17 orders, signed by U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, were disclosed Thursday to the Senate Judiciary Committee, which has raised questions about the Justice Department's use of wiretap laws in espionage and terrorism cases.

The court, now headed by U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, said it intended separately to publish the rulings and promised similarly to disclose any future unclassified orders.

Ashcroft's instructions in March, in a memorandum to FBI Director Robert Mueller and senior Justice officials, made it easier for investigators in espionage and terrorism cases to share information from searches or wiretaps with FBI criminal investigators.

But the surveillance court, which approves requests during secret deliberations, found that Ashcroft's rules could allow misuse of information in criminal cases, where prosecutors must meet higher legal standards to win approval for searches or wiretaps.

"These procedures cannot be used by the government to amend the (surveillance) act in ways Congress has not," the court wrote. In its rare public rebuke, it said the Justice Department spent "considerable effort" arguing its case, "but the court is not persuaded."

Ashcroft had argued that, under changes authorized by the USA Patriot Act, the FBI could use the surveillance law to perform searches and wiretaps "primarily for a law enforcement purpose, so long as a significant foreign intelligence purpose remains."

The Patriot Act, passed late in 2001, changed the surveillance law to permit its use when collecting information about foreign spies or terrorists is "a significant purpose," rather than "the purpose," of such an investigation. Critics at the time said they feared government might use the change as a loophole to employ espionage wiretaps in common criminal investigations.

"The attorney general seized authority that has not been granted to him by the constitution or the Congress," said Marc Rotenberg, head of the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Center.

In a follow-up order also disclosed Thursday, the court accepted new Justice guidelines amending Ashcroft's instructions. The court also demanded to be told about any criminal investigations of targets under the surveillance act and about discussions between the FBI and prosecutors at Justice.

"The first Ashcroft order sort of snugged up against the new line that was being drawn, and that may not have been prudent," said Stewart Baker, an expert on the law and former general counsel at the National Security Agency. "You might be able to justify it legally, but I can see why the court would have reacted badly."

Stewart called the surveillance law "a pretty heavy-duty weapon."

Critics have worried that the surveillance court is too closely allied with the government, noting that judges have rarely denied a request under the 1978 law. But the newly disclosed court's orders indicated irritation with serious FBI blunders in 2000 and 2001.

The court said the FBI admitted in September 2000 to mistakes in 75 wiretap applications, including then-FBI Director Freeh's erroneous statement to judges that the target of a wiretap request wasn't also under criminal investigation.

The court also noted that in March 2000, information from espionage wiretaps in at least four cases was passed illegally to FBI criminal investigators and U.S. prosecutors in New York. Clearly frustrated, the court said it barred one FBI agent from appearing before it.

The FBI admitted more recently, in March 2001, that it inappropriately shared surveillance information among a squad of agents, the court said.

Link to Article Source
ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/spy_court_3

Universal 7 Radio | gtbroadcasting.com | GlobalEnquirer.com | Comment

  News in NWO
  1. Big Brother Will Be Watching You
  2. Pentagon Plans Computer System that Would Peek at Personal Data of Americans
  3. Artifact No Go Logo
  4. Russia to Create Different Kind of New World Order
  5. Big Brother Average American Caught on Camera 8 - 10 Times a Day
  6. Traffic Cameras Could Help Solve Crimes
  7. 1984 Privacy Issues Comes Under Tech Gun
  8. Airports Poised to Begin Traveler ID Program
  9. Big Brother May Expand SpyTraffic Cams Throughout DC
  10. Senators FBI Grabbing More Wiretap
  11. The Hidden Data In Your Drivers License
  12. Britain Leads Way In Eroding Privacy
  13. Chirac Backs Globalisation Tax
  14. Delaware Police Compile Photo Database Of
  15. Patriot Act Setback
  16. NASA Plans To Read Terrorists Minds At Airports
  17. Camps for Citizens Ashcrofts Hellish Vision
  18. Body Trains Capable of Embalming 800 an Hour
  19. Japan Launches Compulsory ID Network Amid
  20. Bush, Ridge Look at Suspending 1878
  21. Banks Share Private Consumer Information
  22. Foundations in Place For Martial Law
  23. National ID Card An American Horror Story
  24. Local Governments to Inspect Inside Homes
  25. Global Eye - Strange Fruit
  26. Ashcroft Touts Citizen Vigilance Plan - Tries to Reassure TIPS Wont Morph into Operation Snoops
  27. Sen Joseph Biden Backs Letting Soldiers
  28. Will Military Enforce US Domestic Laws
  29. Justice Dept Forges Ahead With Tips, Despite Ban by House Majority Leader Dick Armey
  30. Globalists Glum as Lawmakers Reject
  31. Postal Officials Change Stance on Operation TIPS
  32. Switch on for UK State Snooping
  33. Postal Service Wont Join Peeping Tom Program
  34. Who Says the Communists Lost
  35. Globalist Senators Back-Stab US Troops
  36. Citizen Spying Elicits 1984 Fears
  37. A Nation of Peeping Toms
  38. Anger at War Crimes Court Compromise
  39. UN Agrees to US Peacekeeper
  40. Your Confidential Medical Records Are an Open Book Without Your Say-So
  41. Spy Cams Launched in Virginia
  42. Forget Big Brother -
  43. Europeans Blast US Over Global Court
  44. US Will Not Join World Court
  45. US Challenges New Hague Court146s Right to Judge
  46. Euro-police to Patrol UK
  47. Dark Side Of Supermarket Savings Cards
  48. Australia Joins Global Court
  49. Let Europe Rise
  50. Europe Police to Spy on all Emails
  51. UN Wants to Register Worlds Children at Birth
  52. Ashcroft New FBI Plan Protects Rights
  53. FBI Given More Latitude
  54. Ashcroft Announces New Snooping Power
  55. Big Brother in Your Mailbox
  56. How the Feds Steer Your Career
  57. Big Brother Is Watching, Listening
  58. How Big Brother Plans Your Career
  59. Sex Issues Prove Divisive At UN Childrens Summit
  60. Press Coverage Of Implanted Chips Distorted
  61. Bill Would Push Drivers License With Chip
  62. Senators Blame Oil Firms for Price Spikes
  63. Secret US Court OKd 934 Warrants
  64. Surfing the Net and Getting Wet
  65. The Latest Way to Pay is at our Fingertips
  66. Americans Dependence on Government Empowers Feds
  67. Be Afraid - The New World Orders Fascist Pedigree
  68. Chemtrails - Peanut Butter And Barium Sandwiches
  69. Bring Forth Martial Law
  70. The Fourth Reich Nazi Symbols Creeping Up in
  71. Nobel Laureate Thinks Gobally On Currency
  America General
  Asian Anxiety
  Cosmic
  Earth Changes
  Espionage
  Europe
  Financial
  Genetics
  Global
  Mars
  Mexico
  Mideast
  Nukes
  NWO
  Persecution
  Precious Metals
  Prophetic
  Signs
  Strange Stuff
  Technology
  Terrorism
  The Pale Horse
  Unrest
  Yellowstone

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in its efforts to advance the understanding of environmental issues and sustainability, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml



Where applicable, U.S. & Int'l Copyrights by Bryant McGill. All Rights Reserved. Notices and Fair Use. McGill Trademark Licensed from the House of Gill, Corp Sole.