Listen - Sponsor - Stations


Return Home
Future & Past Guests
Affiliate Syndication
About Bryant McGill
Meet Your Co-Hosts
Friends of McGill Live
Event Photographs
Program Archives
OUR COMMUNITY
Request an Interview
Sponsor Information
Apply to be a Guest
Guestbook & Comments
Contact Us
McGill's Online Works
Featured Treaty Signers
Vision Board
Int'l Photo Journal
Universality of Suffering
Books by Guests
Night Riders Magazine
Xammon Magazine
GUEST WEBSEARCH
Media Links
Top News Stories
World News Archives
Bryant's Official Site
The Goodwill Treaty
McGill Charities
Candle Vigils
Give Yourself
No Secrets, No Fear


Carmen Electra
Michael Jackson
Matt Damon
Montel Williams
Ray Romano
Evander Holyfield
Me & Cheech
Ray Lewis
Boomer



Light a Candle
Heal the World



Interesting World News



Discuss this Article | Post Another Article for Discussion

Your Confidential Medical Records Are an Open Book Without Your Say-So

July 8, 2002

Thanks to new federal regulations designed by President Clinton and backed by President Bush, all kinds of people can now access your most private medical records without your say-so, just as NewsMax.com repeatedly warned.

A lawsuit has revealed that a pharmacy company got its hands on the medical records of a woman and sent her junk mail containing samples of one of its drug products, Prozac Weekly, as a remedy for her medical problem, depression.

The lawsuit made Page One of the New York Times this weekend. Why the surprise? This is exactly the sort of privacy invasion NewsMax.com warned about just before the new so-called medical privacy regulations went into effect earlier this year.

In a March 13, 2001, heads-up, NewsMax.com reported that the regulation allegedly intended to improve the confidentiality of medical records contains a sleeper provision that gives health care providers the right to sell a person's confidential medical information to marketing firms and drug companies.

Under the proposal, NewsMax warned, doctors can even share the information with a "business partner," who can conduct marketing on behalf of a provider.

"It's perfectly legal under the rule for someone to knock on your door and say, 'I've learned from your doctor you have hemorrhoids; would you like to buy this treatment?' " said Bob Gellman, a medical privacy consultant and former congressional staffer.

"You can only opt out after you have been marketed to. I've been working on this issue for 20 years, and it's the worst anti-privacy thing I've seen."

President Bush told Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson to allow the new rules to go into effect in April last year despite a storm of protests including the tens of thousands of readers who signed a NewsMax.com petition opposing the Clinton regulations.

In the new lawsuit the unidentified plaintiff alleged she got the Prozac, which is used to treat anxiety and depression, in a hand-addressed manila envelope from a Walgreen's drugstore that contained a "Dear Patient" form letter which said "Enclosed you will find a free one-month trial of Prozac Weekly. Congratulations on being one step [closer] to full recovery."

The form letter appeared to have been written by a Lilly sales representative and was signed by the plaintiff's doctor and two other local doctors.

"We are very excited to be able to offer you a more convenient way to take your antidepressant medication," the letter said. "If you wish to try Prozac Weekly, stop your antidepressant one day before starting Prozac Weekly, then take Prozac Weekly once a week thereafter." According to the New York Times' Adam Liptak, that mailing angered the plaintiff, "a 59-year-old home caregiver who filed a class-action lawsuit this week in a state court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida."

"They're going after me because I have a problem," the woman, told the Times.

She agreed to an interview in her lawyer's office, providing her name would not be revealed. "It bothers me to think that somebody could get into my medical records and start sending me dangerous medications."

The lawsuit says plaintiff, identified only as S.K., has had a diagnosis of depression, "which she maintains in the strictest of confidence due to potential public embarrassment and employment repercussions." It states that she did not have a prescription for Prozac.

"I hadn't been using Prozac for seven years or better," she told the Times. "It was a matter of a few months. It didn't agree with me."

Misuse of Records Charged

The lawsuit names Walgreen's, a local hospital, three doctors and Eli Lilly, which makes Prozac, charging they misused patients' medical records and invaded their privacy. It also accused Walgreen's and the drug company "of engaging in the unauthorized practice of medicine," the Times reported

The plaintiffs' lawyers told the Times they didn't know how many people in addition to their client received the junk mailings. "It could be anywhere from several dozen to several thousand," Gary M. Farmer Jr., one of the lawyers, told the Times.

Dr. Lise Lambert, one of the doctors who signed the "Dear Patient" letter and the plaintiff's physician, is a defendant in the suit. She did not return the Times' calls and her medical group referred the Times' questions to Holy Cross Hospital, which is also named as a defendant.

A hospital spokeswoman said the hospital did not comment on matters in litigation. In early June the hospital issued a statement to the Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel that said, "This particular effort was the result of well-intentioned, respected physicians being given an opportunity to arrange for some of their patients to receive sample medications, at no cost, through proper, licensed pharmacy channels."

The plaintiff told the Times that Dr. Lambert admitted signing blank letterhead, which the Lilly representative added text to and delivered to the drugstore for mailing. Whether or not Dr. Lambert reviewed the letter before signing, the mailing was improper, Dr. David L. Pearle, a professor of medicine at Georgetown University, told the Times.

"It's highly unethical," he said, "because it's clear that the letter is not an outgrowth of the doctor's relationship with the patient."

According to what legal experts told the Times, sending drugs through the mail could be criminal if the recipient does not have a prescription.

Debbie Davis, a Lilly spokeswoman, told the Times that sending unsolicited drugs through the mail was against company policy and inappropriate.

'Appears to Go Beyond'

"While Lilly supports informing people about new treatment options and encouraging them to discuss these options with their doctor, what occurred in Florida appears to go beyond this," she said.

"It is inappropriate for Lilly sales personnel to support programs in which medicine is mailed to patients without the patient's request," she said in a statement.

"We understand why people should be concerned about receiving unsolicited prescriptions in the mail. To the extent Lilly personnel may have participated in this program, Lilly apologizes to those patients affected by it."

Medical privacy advocates have been critical of mailings of targeted marketing materials based on information in patients' pharmaceutical and medical records. They say the mailing of drugs is an unwelcome innovation.

"This is appalling in every possible way," Dr. Pearle told the Times. "It's an escalation of a deplorable practice."

Joy Pritts, senior counsel at the Health Privacy Project in Washington, added that "this is one step beyond what we normally see." She told the Times the Prozac mailing was part of "the increasing trend for the commercialization of health care information."

"It's being bought, sold and used like any other commodity," she said, referring to patients' medical information. "This has nothing to do with treating the patient. This has everything to do with generating profits."

And even more to do with the Bush administration's new rules that allow this sort of thing to happen without the patient giving permission to his or her doctor to release private medical data to every Tom, Dick and Harry.

Phil Brennan, NewsMax.com
Link to Article Source


Universal 7 Radio | gtbroadcasting.com | GlobalEnquirer.com | Comment


  News in NWO
  1. Big Brother Will Be Watching You
  2. Pentagon Plans Computer System that Would Peek at Personal Data of Americans
  3. Artifact No Go Logo
  4. Russia to Create Different Kind of New World Order
  5. Big Brother Average American Caught on Camera 8 - 10 Times a Day
  6. Traffic Cameras Could Help Solve Crimes
  7. 1984 Privacy Issues Comes Under Tech Gun
  8. Airports Poised to Begin Traveler ID Program
  9. Big Brother May Expand SpyTraffic Cams Throughout DC
  10. Senators FBI Grabbing More Wiretap
  11. The Hidden Data In Your Drivers License
  12. Britain Leads Way In Eroding Privacy
  13. Chirac Backs Globalisation Tax
  14. Delaware Police Compile Photo Database Of
  15. Patriot Act Setback
  16. NASA Plans To Read Terrorists Minds At Airports
  17. Camps for Citizens Ashcrofts Hellish Vision
  18. Body Trains Capable of Embalming 800 an Hour
  19. Japan Launches Compulsory ID Network Amid
  20. Bush, Ridge Look at Suspending 1878
  21. Banks Share Private Consumer Information
  22. Foundations in Place For Martial Law
  23. National ID Card An American Horror Story
  24. Local Governments to Inspect Inside Homes
  25. Global Eye - Strange Fruit
  26. Ashcroft Touts Citizen Vigilance Plan - Tries to Reassure TIPS Wont Morph into Operation Snoops
  27. Sen Joseph Biden Backs Letting Soldiers
  28. Will Military Enforce US Domestic Laws
  29. Justice Dept Forges Ahead With Tips, Despite Ban by House Majority Leader Dick Armey
  30. Globalists Glum as Lawmakers Reject
  31. Postal Officials Change Stance on Operation TIPS
  32. Switch on for UK State Snooping
  33. Postal Service Wont Join Peeping Tom Program
  34. Who Says the Communists Lost
  35. Globalist Senators Back-Stab US Troops
  36. Citizen Spying Elicits 1984 Fears
  37. A Nation of Peeping Toms
  38. Anger at War Crimes Court Compromise
  39. UN Agrees to US Peacekeeper
  40. Your Confidential Medical Records Are an Open Book Without Your Say-So
  41. Spy Cams Launched in Virginia
  42. Forget Big Brother -
  43. Europeans Blast US Over Global Court
  44. US Will Not Join World Court
  45. US Challenges New Hague Court146s Right to Judge
  46. Euro-police to Patrol UK
  47. Dark Side Of Supermarket Savings Cards
  48. Australia Joins Global Court
  49. Let Europe Rise
  50. Europe Police to Spy on all Emails
  51. UN Wants to Register Worlds Children at Birth
  52. Ashcroft New FBI Plan Protects Rights
  53. FBI Given More Latitude
  54. Ashcroft Announces New Snooping Power
  55. Big Brother in Your Mailbox
  56. How the Feds Steer Your Career
  57. Big Brother Is Watching, Listening
  58. How Big Brother Plans Your Career
  59. Sex Issues Prove Divisive At UN Childrens Summit
  60. Press Coverage Of Implanted Chips Distorted
  61. Bill Would Push Drivers License With Chip
  62. Senators Blame Oil Firms for Price Spikes
  63. Secret US Court OKd 934 Warrants
  64. Surfing the Net and Getting Wet
  65. The Latest Way to Pay is at our Fingertips
  66. Americans Dependence on Government Empowers Feds
  67. Be Afraid - The New World Orders Fascist Pedigree
  68. Chemtrails - Peanut Butter And Barium Sandwiches
  69. Bring Forth Martial Law
  70. The Fourth Reich Nazi Symbols Creeping Up in
  71. Nobel Laureate Thinks Gobally On Currency
  America General
  Asian Anxiety
  Cosmic
  Earth Changes
  Espionage
  Europe
  Financial
  Genetics
  Global
  Mars
  Mexico
  Mideast
  Nukes
  NWO
  Persecution
  Precious Metals
  Prophetic
  Signs
  Strange Stuff
  Technology
  Terrorism
  The Pale Horse
  Unrest
  Yellowstone

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in its efforts to advance the understanding of environmental issues and sustainability, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml



Where applicable, U.S. & Int'l Copyrights by Bryant McGill. All Rights Reserved. Notices and Fair Use. McGill Trademark Licensed from the House of Gill, Corp Sole.